home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.netspace.net.au!usenet
- From: astroboy@netspace.net.au (Paul Dossett)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications
- Subject: Re: Is MUI processor intensive?
- Date: 10 Feb 1996 08:31:18 GMT
- Organization: NetSpace Online Systems
- Message-ID: <754.6613T992T1265@netspace.net.au>
- References: <9601300825.AA003em@hectortd.demon.co.uk> <487.6609T1155T528@login.dknet.dk>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup-a2-22.mel.netspace.net.au
- X-Newsreader: THOR 2.22 (Amiga;TCP/IP) *UNREGISTERED*
-
- >In article <9601300825.AA003em@hectortd.demon.co.uk>, Paul Copsey
- >(paul@hectortd.demon.co.uk) wrote:
-
- >>Ahh, the magic word, yes MUI is processor intensive, very.
-
- >Of course, it also has a lot more features.
-
- But how many of them are essential?
-
- >>Even on an
- >>030/50 it's bad. :-(
-
- >You are spoiled by the speed of gadtools. I happily use MUI on my
- >7MHz A2000 with a slow 30MB harddisk and 3MB RAM.
-
- You're insane! :)
-
- MUI seems sluggish on my 33Mhz 040. Luckily nothing useful needs it or I'd be
- in trouble!
-
- --
- Paul Dossett | Yamaha, Epiphone, Pearl, Paiste | Amiga 2000/040/21/365/3.1 __
- -------------| Looking for a band to play with | Amiga CD32/020/2/CD/3.1__///
- mail me! : astroboy@netspace.net.au.. | '76 Toyota Corolla 1.2 \XX/
-
-